# KIR-2.1┃Choose BTCMK Deployment Chains

**URL:** <https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118>\
**Category:** Integration Request (KIR)\
**Created:** [June 25, 2024, 8:53am UTC](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118 "2024-06-25T08:53:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeanBrasse](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gov.kuma.bond/jeanbrasse/32/3_2.png) [@JeanBrasse](https://gov.kuma.bond/u/JeanBrasse)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2024, 8:53am UTC](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118/1 "2024-06-25T08:53:53Z")

</div>

**Summary:**

This proposal aims to choose the BTCMK deployment chains, a KUMA Interest-bearing token backed by KUMA NFT, themselves backed by Bitcoin ASIC Equipment owned by Kaneda.

**Rationale:**

With the recent vote in favor of the launch of BTCMK, a KUMA Interest-bearing token backed by KUMA NFT, themselves backed by Bitcoin ASIC Equipment owned by Kaneda; the DAO needs to determine the chain(s) where the KIBT would be deployed.

We propose to initially deploy the BTCMK on [Plume Testnet](https://www.plumenetwork.xyz/).

Deploying the BTCMK on Plume Testnet will make it possible to test the new model of non-rebasing KIBT while participating in the Plume Testnet campaign. This to increase traction and brand in the [Plume Ecosystem](https://www.plumenetwork.xyz/ecosystem).

**Means:**

- Human resources: If the proposal is approved, the KUMA Multisig signers will have to execute the proposal following the voted technical implementation and deploy the protocol on Plume Testnet.
- Treasury resources: There is no treasury cost.

**Technical implementation:**

On Plume Testnet:

1. Smart contracts:

2. Setters on the KUMAAddressProvider smart contract:

3. Setters sur le MCAGRateFeed :

4. Roles attributions :

**Voting options:**

- Accept the deployment of BTCMK
- Against the deployment of BTCMK / Rework the proposal
- Abstain

Authors: Jean Brasse from Mimo Labs

**Community poll:**

_Poll ([view on site](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118/1))_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![N.L1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e274bd/32.png) [@N.L1](https://gov.kuma.bond/u/N.L1)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2024, 9:33pm UTC](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118/2 "2024-06-30T21:33:47Z")

</div>

Why Plume and not ETH or Polygon. This innovation costs time which could also have been a legacy chain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeanBrasse](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gov.kuma.bond/jeanbrasse/32/3_2.png) [@JeanBrasse](https://gov.kuma.bond/u/JeanBrasse)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2024, 2:22pm UTC](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118/3 "2024-07-01T14:22:08Z")

</div>

As the deployment is on testnet only for the moment, we propose to deploy it on Plume testnet to take advantage of potential incentives and growth opportunities in their ecosystem while testing the new technical implementation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![N.L1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e274bd/32.png) [@N.L1](https://gov.kuma.bond/u/N.L1)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2024, 7:26pm UTC](https://gov.kuma.bond/t/kir-2-1-choose-btcmk-deployment-chains/118/4 "2024-07-01T19:26:58Z")

</div>

Okay, but why should it be on a testnet? Kuma protocol wasn’t ready enough yet?